Skip to main content

Hacking democracy

December 26, 2006 by muyiwa

I first knew of an HBO documentary with the above title when I received the November 2006 Cryptogram (an electronic newsletter on computer security published by Bruce Schneier of Counterpane Internet Security).

Because Nigeria had adopted electronic voting, I felt that the documentary would probably help me to better understand the issues, so I asked a friend to make a recording for me. I had a quick look at that recording a few days after I arrived in the US, and I've just finished watching it again. That documentary is nothing if not an indictment of the electronic voting processes in the US.

The software in the machines used in the US elections were not audited, and the documentary shows how easily the individual machines, as well as the software in the central tabulating centre could be hacked, and effectively give the election to whichever candidate the hacker wants.

In the murky waters of Nigerian politics, with deadly desperate politicians, it's not difficult to imagine the potential for massive fraud during the forthcoming elections in Nigeria next spring. There have already been complaints of faulty machines used for voter registration, and, as in the US, inadequate numbers of machines. Also, as in the US, there has been no auditing of the software (or hardware for that matter) to be used in the Nigerian elections. And in spite of public outcry against the use of these machines, and attempts by the legislature to ban their use, Nigeria's lectoral body and the executive are insisting on going ahead.

With the voting machines so potentially easy to compromise, is there any reason to expect an outcome of the upcoming elections in Nigeria different from what the incumbent government wants?

And just in case you're still doubting how easy it is to steal an election, take a look here. See this Forbes article by a Johns Hopkins University computer science professor for reasons why we must not rely on computers alone for elections, and here for a security analysis of the software used in most of the machines used in the US elections.

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

— Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)

Reply of the Pennsylvania Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755

Reclaim your computer!

A personal computer is called a personal computer because it's yours. Anything that runs on that computer, you should have control over.
— Andrew Moss, Microsoft's senior director of technical policy, 2005

The most serious impediment to a lasting archive is the evolution of media, platforms, formats, and the applications that create them. Unique, proprietary, and constantly evolving data formats such as Acrobat-4, MPEG-4, Oracle 8, Quicken 2001, Real G2, and Word 2000 suggest or even guarantee obsolescence.
— Gordon Bell, Senior Researcher in Microsoft's Media Presence Research Group.

LIMITATION ON AND EXCLUSION OF DAMAGES. You can recover from Microsoft and its suppliers only direct damages up to the amount you paid for the software. You cannot recover any other damages, including consequential, lost profits, special, indirect or incidental damages.
— Clause 26 of the Windows 7 License.

Moodle Resources

Open source web conference systems

Premium Drupal Themes by Adaptivethemes